On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:44:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Does this help? > > AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([]) > > That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be > in CVS).
I can send you a patch against 1.5 if you want. > I don't see it that bad that C is not a proper tag, actually. > > It would also be good if enable_shared and enable_static became proper tag > variables instead of globals. BTW, the October patch for -shared > and -static handling (which I just noted) is a complete duplicate of the > special tags disable-shared and disable-static. It should be reverted IMO, > it is just featurism. When *I* proposed such a change (with no attached > patch, granted :-) I was told to use the multi-language branch instead. Why make enable_shared and enable_static specific to a tag? Wouldn't it be odd that you create shared libs for "C" programs and static for "C++"? And, the --enable-shared and --enable-static options would have to multiply (--enable-c-shared, --enable-cxx-shared, etc). -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
