On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > The effect of the original patch was to reduce the maintenance > hassle of changing libtool after we discover a new option that > should be passed through, and then have everyone wait for the patch > to percolate through to a release. With that in mind, it would be a > shame to have to revert the patches now. > > Maybe we could mandate that option arguments to be passed through > libtool have to be mangled? So we'd accept, say, -Woff=all and > unmangle it before calling the compiler...
We shouldn't force the users to change their behavior though. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
