Hi Daniel! Daniel Reed wrote: > What is branch-1-5's current role?
1.5 is winding down its status as stable branch. > There have been patches checked in as > of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release? There are no concrete plans to make another release from branch-1-5 at the moment. > If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily, I'll apply it. > I would like to pick the version of libtool to ship with our upcoming > Fedora Core 3 release. Should I track CVS branch-1-5 and use a version > number like libtool-1.5.8.0.200409171404, can I rely on there being a > 1.5.9 release in the next few weeks, or should I track CVS 1.9? Please don't ship CVS revisions except as additional versions to a stable release version. 1.9 in particular has had a lot of code churn recently and will need at least one more alpha before we can release 2.0. > If I take no action, we are currently set to ship 1.5.6 with a number of > patches--most of which have been applied or reproduced in branch-1-5 > since 1.5.8. I'll make a stable release from branch-1-5 (1.5.10 according to Release Numbering on http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html) if I can apply Ralf's patch... Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool