* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:29:37PM CET: > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:46:09PM CET: > > I just want to get some possibilities out there into the ether. Feel free > > to add more bits/say which bits are silly. > > branch 2.0: > > I would like to see one arch which has no dynamic linking but still > passes the relevant libltdl preopen tests. Anyone?
Decide whether we also allocate the slist* prefix in libltdl; document the resulting namespace requirements or wrap under lt_*. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
