On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 11:20 +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Albert Chin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 03:43:48PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > > Ick. Libtool is about portably building/using libraries. Why can't we > > leave it at that? > > But linking against installed libraries using the correct -L and -l flags > *is* part of portably building/using libraries! ;-) > > Haven't thought through the -I thing yet though... maybe that doesn't > belong in libtool... maybe we could provide a macro that can intuit > include directories from .la locations... I dunno... > The most common arrangement is libraries in /usr/lib and includes in /usr/include/<package>-<version> ... so not easy to intuit like that.
Scot -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool