On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 17:37 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:53:15AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > I actually tend to think we should look at this the other way ... if we > > could expose the information Libtool has to other tools, pkg-config > > could defer to Libtool. > > > > So rather than libtool taking over pkg-config, we make them work > > together. > > so, what you want, is simply something like ... > > $ pkg-config --libs foo > -L/path/to -lfoo > $ pkg-config --libs-libtool foo > /path/to/libfoo.la > $ pkg-config --libs bar > -L/path/to -lbar -L/path/to -lfoo > $ pkg-config --libs-libtool bar > /path/to/libbar.la > > where libbar depends on libfoo? > Something along those lines, perhaps; yes. I haven't fully thought out my plans yet.
> if so, then write the patch and give it to the pkg-config folks. > I took over pkg-config from Havoc some time ago; I haven't had the time to either patch or reimplement it yet :o) Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool