On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > It does assume that all library dependencies are registered, yes. This > > has never been a problem, because we've never found any Libtool-produced > > library that doesn't have all dependencies registered. > > > > If this isn't the case, and at one time Libtool never registered all of > > the dependencies, we should check for that. Otherwise I don't see the > > need -- we can assume sanity from our own output. > > for a long time, libtool did not handle -pthread properly. > It still doesn't, the current situation is a botch that produces the right results but does it in the wrong way. Libraries should record what compiler/linker flags they need (-pthread is not a dependency library).
> I can point to at least a few .la files on my system that do > not have -pthread or even other required libraries registered. > I'd be quite shocked if the current version of Libtool produces libraries with -pthread in dependency_libs; I specifically wrote the patch to prevent that, because it causes a lot of problems. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
