Hi Sander, Sander Niemeijer wrote: > If more people require this functionality then I am all for including it > in the libtool package. However, this doesn't answer the question > whether the macro should be based on a libtool script or not. > Furthermore, other users might have other macros that are also perfectly > valid in wanting to use the libtool script. How do we deal with those > macros?
Oversimplifying, but: In a configure script, you can spell `libtool -[options] [objects]' as `LT_CHECK_LIB([options], [objects])'. Maybe we need LT_LINK_IFELSE instead/as well. Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool