[ sorry, forgot one part ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:10:22AM CEST: > * Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:20:18AM CEST: > > > > I think I got my problem resolved by using the lastest version of > > libtool (1.5.18) : with exactly the same command sequence, I get > > a static library with libtool-1.5.18 in the .libs/ directory, while > > libtool-1.5.6 doesn't produce it. Is it a known behaviour ? Are there *snip* > > Fortunately, your problem is not related to 1.5.6 vs 1.5.18 at all (at > least not a lot). If you had configured and compiled 1.5.6 yourself > with "cc" as C compiler, it would have worked fine. Or used "gcc" > instead of "cc" as compiler name. Or -- and this is the real solution > to your problem -- add "--tag=CC" to your command line. I actually > forgot to mention this the first time around: > > libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -o ...
Erm, surely the fact that 1.5.18 does not create a static library but also does not warn nor fail with unguessed tag still looks like a bug to me. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool