-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

|
| OK.  Does `id -u' tell you whether you are SYSTEM (id 0?) or not?
| What would be an appropriate solution for cygwin?


Perhaps instead of going through hoops here we need to rethink the whole
idea of using tar to keep the timestamps accurate. Maybe using one of the
other ideas in the original report?

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-02/msg00115.html

Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQtPVWLiDAg3OZTLPAQIdggQAgHUrRc1+jsmOUAq6o7M3qtE8eY1ifv5O
mbxnQmSYGcHmUfkKdH05uUVr5y9T7gmqJ8FjOxQ1drrnZdw2YU5KwFM2p+rb413W
76YbNXMkzcslGb2A6P5hPcq8xsAJNJru/EFsOzJUSa/NMA+nKudAV84zco99H/Wz
yu2MHw6IpZQ=
=3Wma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Reply via email to