-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jacob Meuser wrote: | | Thorsten's statement is somewhat misleading. you can definitely link | libraries and dlopened modules against libraries without having all | those libraries linked directly to the executable. | | but, there was something of a policy decision made to not link libraries | against eachother. actually, this policy is somewhat under debate, and | the runtime linker is getting a bit of a reworking ... | | as far as why -lstdc++ is not always used, I can't find the reason ATM, | but I do remember some discussion of that at some point. maybe it's | possible that -lstdc++ is not always necessary for each and every g++ | link command? | | knowing that not always using -lstdc++ was a conscious decision, I would | really consider libtool adding -lstdc++ to be a bug. |
Well, we need to find a solution to the original poster's problem (runtime loading a c++ library from a C application), and I don't see another way to do that. We'd appreciate as much information about this as possible. I'd better go google, I suppose :-) Peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBQzNBMbiDAg3OZTLPAQJRaQQAkwA0KWuYjDGFKQQnDf9MfkGfH6fszYnq HQJPadHI1qnxJSm2TEGRcCbl14xJ6nWlw3NfmjB4adORckL7Qz4FrbpI1tEFUk1j zPPAHCILrnZFxtgOKBj+dr7/Nm0q/Z2IAcpLuZ9nWsQF3v22+ltaTd7t4IdepuS8 EqtfiHhESuo= =PrkY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
