Hi Bob, Pierre, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:47:27PM CET: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > >When using ltdl on Windows to load plug-ins there is a problem with the > >name mangling system. The info.name field is only set if libltdl finds a > >.la file. Just the DLL won't do. The result is that symbols cannot be > >found becaus libltdl looks for the plain name (without prefix). > > > >The problem should be the same on all systems, so I'm guessing this is > >intended behaviour. So I'm wondering what's the rationale? > > It is intended that modules be loaded by specifying the name or path > to the module .la file.
True. It is still worthwhile to fix this in libltdl though (and I believe it is on our TODO list, too). Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
