On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:04:17AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Albert Chin wrote on Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:49:29PM CEST: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Albert Chin wrote on Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:08:15PM CEST: > > > > Any reason we don't use -bexpall to support -export-dynamic on AIX? > > > > > > Yes, as commented in libtool.m4: > > > I think this is still correct. How should I fix it? > > Well. In what way(s) do gaim and galculator fail, and why? > Is there a way to reproduce the failure without much hassle > such as lots of required packages, maybe even a stripped down > test case? Are those packages doing something we may want > to allow, or is it impossible to realize portably anyway? > I'm sorry but I cannot answer your question without more > information. (That is not to say that I could otherwise ;-)
When I say "how should I fix it", I mean what's the best way to implement -export-dynamic on AIX. Maybe a new export_dynamic_cmds command that creates the symbols ala export_symbols_cmds and then export_dynamic_flag_spec to add the ld flag to export the symbols from export_symbols_cmds to the binary? gaim/galculator fail because they require symbols in the main executable to be exported to dlopen()'ed modules. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
