Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > we messed up with your conversion from CVS to git. More precisely, > when we announced that git would be the primary repo, it had > - all tags pointing to wrong trees, > - no signed tags, > - a seemingly bogus history for the tree before version 1.2c. > > We have fixed the first two issues now, and are ignoring the last. > We might look into having the old CVS history available for people > who'd like to do archeology.
AFAICS the history in the git repository correctly matches the CVS tree, only the tags are pointing to the wrong commits. > For you, that means, if you've cloned the git repository before now, > you will have to take some steps in order to have the right tags. > This is how you delete all local tags and fetch them again from > upstream (do not do this if you have added tags yourself locally!): > git tag -d `git tag -l` > git pull Just running git fetch --tags should be enough. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
