Hi Ralf, On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[snip] > Is this an optimization only, or a necessary thing? IOW, if I omit > libfoo-1.0 in this "CC -Tprelink_objects" line, would that only > pessimize link time, or could it affect the link result? I'll let John answer this > Anyway, I think the patch below should implement this (and add John to > THANKS). Can you try it? Thanks. The test still fails although the patch could be correct. It looks like this never makes it into the generated libtool. > + _LT_TAGVAR(reload_cmds, $1)='$CC -Tprelink_objects $reload_objs~$CC > -r -o $output$reload_objs' ..... t...@server01-unixware 132% grep Tprelink libtool old_archive_cmds="\$CC -Tprelink_objects \$oldobjs~ ..... In fact there is no reload_cmds= in the TAG CONFIG: CXX section ..... t...@server01-unixware 133% grep -n "^reload_cmds=" libtool 123:reload_cmds="\$LD\$reload_flag -o \$output\$reload_objs" t...@server01-unixware 134% grep -n "CONFIG: CXX" libtool 9097:# ### BEGIN LIBTOOL TAG CONFIG: CXX 9245:# ### END LIBTOOL TAG CONFIG: CXX ..... -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 t...@multitalents.net _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool