* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 05:01:18AM CEST: > Is someone here willing to contribute a portable m4 macro which > tests the compiler (and/or linker) to prove beyond a shadow of a > doubt that it adequately supports the implicit linkage required? The > tests should work for more than Linux and should be based on > observed behavior.
Is support in Debian full now? Do dlopen'ed modules that have indirect dependencies outside of default-searched library paths get loaded correctly now, with DT_RPATH entries only pointing to direct deplibs (and recursively for their DT_RPATH entries)? > Support for indirect dependencies should be a configure option so > that it should be specifically requested. See $link_all_deplibs (which is "no" on Debian but "yes" in FSF Libtool). Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
