Hi Chris, On 8 Jun 2010, at 20:06, Christopher Hulbert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or >> another so that it doesn't get ignored for any longer than it has already. > > I would like it to not get ignore longer either, but just looking at > the branch after pulling, I still don't see a hint of support for > either Intel or PGI compilers on windows, both of which my changes > support. That means I will likely have to continue to keep a local > branch with all my changes. In addition, I might have to work around > any issues created from the merge of the pr-msvc-support branch. > Obviously making more work for 1 person shouldn't stop libtool > progress, but I think taking the time to come up with a plan on what > will be supported when the branch is merged in and making it useful > for people like me using other native Windows compilers (again, Intel > and PGI) would be nice. No matter what, I am sure I can work > with/around whatever happens, but I would certainly prefer that the > official libtool have more Windows support than at least I can see > from the pr-msvc-support branch.
Both Peter and Chuck have commit rights, and might be interested in merging your changes into pr-msvc-support or master if you rebase them from one or the other and submit? Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool