Hi Paolo, On 10 Jun 2010, at 08:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 04:46 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It >> seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test and extend >> as a whole new script. Let's call it, $prefix/libexec/libtool/ar, build it >> from $srcdir/libltdl/config/ar.m4sh, and have libtool set AR to point at the >> script instead of /usr/bin/ar when the system is funky. > > What about embedded libtool, which is really the common case? What is "embedded libtool"? For cross-compiling to underspecified embedded systems? Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
