On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> I think the warning message is a bit miss-leading. If libusbx found >> 0000/0000, then it should probably warn against unrecognized device. > > If Windows says that there is a 0:0 device when there is actually an > error, and if this case is indistinguishable from an OK device with > 0:0 in the device descriptor, then the Windows backend should not > discard the device. > > However, if Windows always considers a device with 0:0 in the device > descriptor an error, then the Windows backend should discard them.
I believe that Windows always considers a device with 0:0 in the device descriptor as an error. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
