On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Jach Fong <jf...@ms4.hinet.net> wrote: > Hi! Xiaofan, > > Thanks for the guidance on choosing the libusb... I think > I will stick on the -win32 version at this moment, but like to > experiment with the newer libusbx. > > Back to my problem raised in my first mail that a -0x0C > was returned when call the libusb_open(). There is one HID > (Silicon Lab's ToolStick) in those devices I had tested. > > I had try this HID on three different PCs (all WinXP SP3). > Two of them are always fail, the third one worked in a strange > way that the open() function takes more than 5 seconds to return > a zero. > > Am I correct that HID device should work without WinUSB?
If it is an HID device, then libusbx 1.0.11 should actually work. Please post your program snippets and debug log (you can set LIBUSB_DEBUG environmental variable to 4 and then run your program). -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
