2012/7/3 Tobias Powalowski <tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com>: > Hi guys, > got that bugreport: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30467 > > any idea how to solve it?
Why is the lib called libusb.a and not libusb-1.0.a? My hypothesis is that libusb.a comes from libusb-compat and is not (statically) linked with libusb (or libusbx). So of course all the libusb-1.0 symbols are missing. Can you check that? Another good idea is to NOT distribute a static lib. Only the dynamic .so should be provided. But that is not the problem. Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
