On 2012.07.13 16:46, Toby Gray wrote: > Would keeping a list of the registered device handles > (dev_info_data.DevInst) with each device and compare against that list > be better? It then would at least avoid multiple string comparisons.
Currently, I'm thinking that what we probably want is avoid calling set_hid_interface() more than it should, so that's what I'm looking into. And the same could probably apply to set_composite_interface(). Unless we expect the device to have changed its device interface paths between two get_device_list() calls, which I don't see happening without the hash used to determine if it's an already instantiated device also changing, the call into set_hid_interface() is likely superfluous. I've been sidetracked with other issues, but since we observe a crash on Windows, I'll be looking into it soon. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
