Hi Anthony,

On 2012.09.04 04:15, Anthony Clay wrote:
> I've been unable to test isochronous
> transfers.  Obviously, Winusb doesn't support them - but I thought that
> libusbK does - maybe it is not implemented w/libusb (yet?).

That's exactly the case. It's the usual case of too much to do with too 
little time to do it. For the record, libusb0 and libusbK driver support 
will be flagged experimental for some time after official introduction 
in 1.0.13, which means that you shouldn't expect all features to be 
supported (or even existing ones to be 100% stable).

We'll work our way to add Isochronous support, but this will most likely 
be a slower process than you would like...

By the way, if you think you could help contributing with a libusbx 
sample we could use to test isochronous support (or maybe a modification 
of the xusb sample to do just that), it would help, as we'll need to 
test our implementation one way or another.

What's is the target device you are planning to use to test isochronous 
transfers?

Regards,

/Pete





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to