2012/9/15 Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie>:
> I have now pushed the bMaxPower change to mainline. Before I go 1.0.13-rc1
> however, I think I'm warming up to the idea of having a macro in libusb.h,
> that could be used to uniquely identify API changes.
>
> Basically, I'm thinking of something like:
>
> #define LIBUSBX_API_VERSION 0x01001234

No objection.

> Otherwise, for the bMaxPower update, my current preferred proposal would be 
> to have user copy/paste the new libusbx descriptor structure as is, use that 
> in their app exclusively and then use a cast. This is what I am currently 
> pointing out to do in the NEWS update.

I realy do not like this idea. Structures defined by the API should
not be redefined by the application. That is the source of more
problems later.

> +* Fix unwanted cancellation of pending timeouts as well as amjor timeout
> related bugs

amjor -> major

> +* Add Cypress FX/FX2 firmware upload sample, based fxload from
> +  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net

based fxload -> based on fxload


I also submitted a new patch at https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/pull/44

Bye

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to