On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I see 3 possible solutions:
>
> 1) Revert the change, and do a 1.0.14 release with just that change
> right away, before anyone starts depending on the new name
>
> 2) Adapt usbutils to work with both versions of the API, as is suggested
> in the release announcement. But given what you said above I guess you're
> unwilling to do that ?
>
> 3) Go with the anonymous union solution discussed before, and do a 1.0.14
> release with that change right away.
>
1 or 3.
I'm with Greg on this one.
Orin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
