On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > On 2012.10.01 00:57, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> One minor issue, libusb0.dll is not used for libusbK.dll, libusbk.dll >> directly talked to libusb0.sys, just like it directly talks to libusbk.sys. > > Ok. I was wondering about that as well. Another good job from Travis > then (but then leaving me even more puzzled on the inclusion of > libusb0.dll in the K installation). > >> The inf-wizard from libusb-win32 release does use libwdi but it >> does not bundle libusbk.dll. > > The issue is libwdi, since we all use the same libusb-win32.inf.in > Unless Travis or yourself modified the inf template from libwdi for the > inf-wizard, you should of course see the same behaviour as Zadig. >
Travis indeed modified the libwdi 1.2.1 and distributes the modified source with libusbK source package. http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FlibusbK%2Fsrc%2Flibwdi -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
