On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 16:57 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, therau2000 wrote:
> > When program xusb fails to claim interface 0, it would seem possible to
> > "activate SCSI Pass Through". Further calls to libusb_bulk_transfer
> > could then be transparent to the application program. I guess there
> > should be a "deactivate SCSI Pass Through" as well to resume normal
> > operations.
>
> This is completely wrong. SCSI Pass Through is nothing like
> libusb_bulk_transfer; they are totally different. One cannot be used
> as a substitute for the other. It would be like trying to use "ls" as
> a substitute for "dd".
There you see I am no USB expert; I am just an application programmer.
But I imagine, if you added "SCSI Pass Through" to libusbx, there would
be an "activate" and a "de-activate" or something like that; is that
correct ?
therau2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WINDOWS 8 is here.
Millions of people. Your app in 30 days.
Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources.
http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/
join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
