On 10.2.2013 3.03, "Xiaofan Chen" <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >I think the hotplug API proposed there is not complete >and I am sure Pete will have some different ideas >about the API. libusbx and libusb will probably diverge >on the Hotplug API.
I'm all for diverging at this point if it makes technical sense. > >As for the implementation, you can see that Peter is not >satisfied with the Linux implementation. He has a good >point about udev not always available, especially among >Android and other embedded Linux platform. He also made a comment that this would be built time decision (using udev or what's-the-other-option). Now, I find that disturbing this seems to imply something that I as an application developer would not like. What I want is to be able to bundle a version that I have tested my application with in binary form that does not require compiling by the end user or him/her getting it from somewhere else. So I would not like to go that route. br Kusti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
