Toby Gray wrote: > We've been looking into the performance of the Windows desktop and > Windows CE versions of libusbx compared to Linux on the same hardware. > The event handling in Windows and Windows CE appears to take > considerably longer than for Linux. > > This is understandable given the way that the windows backends need to > pretend to have fds for the core of libusbx to process.
Can you share with the performance numbers you have and a short description of how you got them? You've made me really curious here. Intuitively, I would have guessed that whatever fd futzing was going on was absolutely insignificant when compared to the overhead of user/kernel transitions and user event processing. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
