Hans de Goede wrote: > I would like to give libusb using applications to os cached string > descriptors, so that those can be accessed without the need to open a > device and do io on it.
The device is already open, because your API requires a libusb_device, right? So, you're saving the cost of one device descriptor read, and two string descriptor reads. I don't know. The API is well-defined and simple enough, but it doesn't require any information private to the library. Would it be used often enough to justify including it in the library, as opposed to having it in a code sample? I can't judge that. I am, admittedly, a minimalist. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
