2013/6/11 Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie>: > On 2013.06.11 15:01, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: >> Are all libusbx maintainers back to libusb-devel mailing list? > > Besides myself, I don't think any of the other maintainers ever > officially left libusb-devel. And I have been monitoring what happened > over at libusb-devel anyway. > > Yet, I would still recommend posting to the mailing list relevant to the > library you were using when encountering an issue, or, if it's something > you found duplicated in both, then post to both lists. > While maintainers are monitoring both lists, people who might have > encountered the same problem or have some ideas of what you could try > next, may only be subscribed to a single one. > Remember that maintainers aren't the only people who can provide advice > on an issue (and that's a good thing!). >
Ok, fine. >> BTW, when everything starts to happen in libusb-devel again, would you >> guys mind coming back to the [libusb] prefix in messages subject >> again? > > Can you explain a bit more about this? Did the libusb-devel prefix > change or something? If so, do you have any idea what the reason was? > Well, traditionally every mailing list I am subscribed to prefix the subjects with the mailing list name. For example, the subject in every message I receive from libusbx begins with [libusbx], and this (I believe) is automatically done by the mailing list tool. But since some time ago, libusb subject messages don't come with the [libusb] prefix anymore. I know this may sound a bit captious, but when you are subscribed to a bunch of mailing lists, it is very worth... -- Best Regards, Wander Lairson Costa ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
