On 20/06/2013 00:07, "Pete Batard" <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: >On 2013.06.19 18:09, Sean McBride wrote: >>> I would have thought every one would >>> run their compilers with (almost) every possible warning >>> turned on > >Not gonna happen as far as I'm concerned.
I wasn't suggesting that you (or anyone should) I was just curious because I always do. Thanks for the long explanation, so it comes down to the fact that there are more compilers compilers and variations between them than I realised. br Kusti This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. We will not be liable for direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on or as of transmission of this e-mail in general. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
