> Glad we could publicly establish that ASMedia doesn't seem to care about
> their actual customers. Hopefully this will help potential buyers of
> ASMedia-based hardware decide whether they want to use products from a
> company which, if your report is correct, appears to have little interest in
> receiving feedback from end users, in order to improve their products.
I think you're being a little harsh on them here. They are an IC design house,
they sell to OEM's, that's what they see as their customers, and that's who
they chose to support. It's a common business model, it's not like they are
unique in this regard (go check the linux kernel for instance for reverse
engineered vs vendor supported drivers). Sure you don't have to like it (and
I'm with you on that one) but going down the path of 'i hope people see this
and don't buy products' seems a little... harsh?
On a more positive note, if/when time permits i'll see what i can do about
redoing the enumeration code but given the patch in my opening post already
scratches most of my itch, it'll be rather low on my todo list .
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/147#issuecomment-25212686
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
