W dniu czwartek, 6 lipca 2017 17:30:05 UTC+2 użytkownik Ben Noordhuis
napisał:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Przemysław Sobala
> <przemysl...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
> > Hello
> > [In the preface I want to say that it can be valgrind's false positive].
> > I'm building a C++ class that uses libuv (1.13.0) and libcurl (7.54.1)
> for
> > non-blocking file downloading. UV loop is being initialized in object's
> > constructor, deinitialized in destructor and it's being kept a class
> member.
> > When it's a pointer type class member (uv_loop_t *), initialized via
> malloc:
> > loop = (uv_loop_t *) malloc(sizeof(uv_loop_t));
> > if (loop == NULL) {
> > throw std::bad_alloc();
> > }
> > uv_loop_init(loop);
> > and deinitialized via uv_loop_close(loop) there's no memory leak.
> >
> > But when it's a struct type class member (uv_loop_t) it's initialized
> > automatically while object construction, then in constructor I call
> > uv_loop_init(&loop) and uv_loop_close(&loop) in destructor, valgrind
> reports
> > a memory leak:
> > ==2337== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 790 of
> 840
> > ==2337== at 0x4C2FC47: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:785)
> > ==2337== by 0x816560: maybe_resize (core.c:808)
> > ==2337== by 0x816560: uv__io_start (core.c:847)
> > ==2337== by 0x8181EB: uv_poll_start (poll.c:120)
> > ==2337== by 0x417ECE:
> > imageresizer::engine::FileDownloader::handle_socket(void*, int, int,
> void*)
> > (FileDownloader.cpp:298)
> > ==2337== by 0x417E28:
> > imageresizer::engine::FileDownloader::handle_socket_cb(void*, int, int,
> > void*, void*) (FileDownloader.cpp:277)
> > ==2337== by 0x7D1798: singlesocket (in
> > /opt/WP/imageresizer-worker/dist/Debug/GNU-Linux/imageresizer-worker)
> > ==2337== by 0x7D4AD9: multi_socket (in
> > /opt/WP/imageresizer-worker/dist/Debug/GNU-Linux/imageresizer-worker)
> > ==2337== by 0x7D4C86: curl_multi_socket_action (in
> > /opt/WP/imageresizer-worker/dist/Debug/GNU-Linux/imageresizer-worker)
> > ==2337== by 0x417D59:
> > imageresizer::engine::FileDownloader::on_timeout(uv_timer_s*)
> > (FileDownloader.cpp:248)
> > ==2337== by 0x417D25:
> > imageresizer::engine::FileDownloader::on_timeout_cb(uv_timer_s*)
> > (FileDownloader.cpp:242)
> > ==2337== by 0x81D4B4: uv__run_timers (timer.c:165)
> > ==2337== by 0x8159AB: uv_run (core.c:353)
> >
> > Can you help me with getting rid of that memory leak?
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > Przemysław Sobala
>
>
> Check the return value of uv_loop_close(). My guess it's UV_EBUSY,
> indicating the event loop can't be closed yet because there are open
> handles or requests.
>
Yes, but uv_loop_close() returns UV_EBUSY in both cases.
Should I wait some time for all handles to close or iterate over all
handles inside loop and call uv_close() ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"libuv" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to libuv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to libuv@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
