On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 12:05, Ben Noordhuis <i...@bnoordhuis.nl> wrote: > -1 corresponds to UV_EPERM on most platforms. > > If your assumption is that because the type is ssize_t it can only be > >= -1, that's mistaken. Hope that helps!
What is mistaken? All references I read about ssize_t say that it's supposed to be >= -1: For instance, https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_types.h.html: > The type ssize_t shall be capable of storing values at least in the range > [-1, {SSIZE_MAX}]. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to libuv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/libuv/CALiegf%3DpNZBGFFHAf6jfxC%2BRCS9dPa67f3ti3OR-z95%2B_Ba1dQ%40mail.gmail.com.
