On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 14:50 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:28:30PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > If libuuid from e2fsprogs is available, we use that to
> > generate UUIDs.
>
> On the one hand I think its good to re-use existing libraries where
> they fullfill our needs, but then we need to keep a built-in impl of
> UUID generator for non-Linux systems which typically won't have a
> e2fsprogs available. So rather than maintaining two separate impls
> of the UUID code, which splits the testing coverage, I'd be inclined
> to just always use the builtin version. Guarenteeing consistent
> algorithm / semantics for UUID generation across all platforms.
I don't have a strong opinion either way ... I'd prefer us to not have
any UUID generation code of our own at all since we'll inevitably have
the rfc4122 zealots coming down on us, but we'll always have to have
that code, so ...
I didn't optionally use uuid_parse() for the exact reasoning you
describe, but I think that reasoning is less important for UUID
generation since we're effectively treating them as opaque random
numbers.
You're happy with the other two patches, then?
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
