On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:25 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> So far, the release model for libvirt (correct me if I'm wrong) has been
> that you periodically bundle up the latest version of libvirt and put it
> on the website. There's no experimental branch where we can place
> things like a libvirt remote patch with the proviso that at some point
> later we can say "sorry, that didn't work".
I'd be happy to see this stuff in CVS on a "remote branch", but it
would be quite a pain for you to maintain a branch in CVS.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
