On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 04:44 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> In general I really prefer restartable daemons especially if the client can
> auto restart them if they are gone missing, it makes users and sysadmins
> life so much easier (and avoid the need to start the daemon at bootup, which
> is yet another pain), though I understand this may be hard to achieve because
> we have too much state.
Well, the problem here is that you want the daemon to start guests and
domains at boot time. That's the main reason for the initscript.
> With respect to the unification of the various daemons, this also sounds
> like a really nice thing to have, but I must admit I'm a bit lost, I don't
> have really a clear picture of all the requirements (and probably won't until
> we finalize at least a first version of the networking support).
Stop confusing me! :-)
s/networking/remote/
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
