Hi Daniel,
On 07.05.2007, at 22:06, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:13:57AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
Hi, Jan
I think you should use 0.2.1 at this moment.
libvirt cannot handle Xen-hypervisor-domctl correctly on 0.2.2.
But Xen-hypervisor-sysctl works fine.
This problem recognized in two weeks ago,
but I have no time to investigate this issue.
I've been trying to reproduce / diagnose the problems you reported too
but not had much luck so far. Every way I look at it the code looks to
be using the correct hypercall numbers, operation numbers & structs.
Until I just noticed this:
Thank you for trying to tracking down this error.
Even though I get the following error from virsh command line interface,
<error>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libvirt-0.2.1]# ./src/virsh
libvir: error : no support for hypervisor
lt-virsh: error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
</error>
my own program works fine with the libraries of 0.2.1.
The reason I had no success before with version 0.2.1 was because
before this version was compiled with the libraries of 0.2.1. After I
cleaned up my system and build 0.2.1 again I could use the library.
But now the virsh command is not working and I don't know how to
figure out with which library version it was build.
To get to the point:
I use version 0.2.1 for now and will test one of the newer version
when it is able to handle Xen-hypervisor-domctl correctly as Atsushi
said.
The second thing is that we've just discovered a bug in the Fedora Xen
kernels 2.6.20 wrt to SMP which could cause random bad things to
happen
So if you're using a Fedora 2.6.20 kernel it is also worth seeing
if it
is still a problem with an older Fedora 2.6.19/18 kernel, or with the
vanilla upstream Xen
I'm not really shure about my kernel version and its origin because I
didn't compiled it myself. But it is very likely that my kernel is no
Fedora one because I use Scientific Linux.
Cheers,
Jan
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
