Hi This patch adds virsh attach-device/detach-device. This supports a definition of a device by command option(proposal 1).
I examine the following opinions, and "attach-interface" supports only two common case (bridge, virtual network). > Networking is more complicated because there are 8 (!) different ways to > connected up VMs so far. We could either have huge numbers of args, or > we could just support the two common cases (bridge, virtual network) and > say for more complex cases use full XML. Any comments are welcome! Signed-off-by: Masayuki Sunou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Masayuki Sunou. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh" "Masayuki Sunou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: > Hi > > I understood as follows. > > * There is no problem in a proposal 1 and a proposal 2 > * It is better that the user can choose use of XML and use of command-option > by the situation > > Therefore, I want to add both proposal 1 and proposal 2 to virsh. > There is no problem in this opinion? > > And, I am going to correct about naming. > vif --> interface > vbd --> disk
attach_detach_opt.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
