On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 05:47:51 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote: > okay, the patch looks fine, but what happens when you leave > (type ioemu) in 3.1 expressions ? Does it fail ? If it doesn't > fail, maybe we can avoid the complexity added by this patch, right ?
It does not fail on 3.1 even if I remove (type ioemu) because it is not necessary to add specially. Thanks, Saori Fukuta -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
