On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:23:19AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:45:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >It would still be useful to have a chart describing what APIs are 
> > >implemented
> > >by which driver though & any restrictions the impl may have.
> > 
> > I'll have a go at this.
> 
>   Yes that would be useful thanks ! But I'm afraid it may be painful to
> maintain too, as the various case may increase and the state of the
> drivers/hypervisors will evolve.

This is why library documentation should *always* mention what version
an API became supported/was added in. It's utterly miserable trying to
use an evolving library otherwise :)

regards
john

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to