On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:23:19AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:45:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > >It would still be useful to have a chart describing what APIs are > > >implemented > > >by which driver though & any restrictions the impl may have. > > > > I'll have a go at this. > > Yes that would be useful thanks ! But I'm afraid it may be painful to > maintain too, as the various case may increase and the state of the > drivers/hypervisors will evolve.
This is why library documentation should *always* mention what version an API became supported/was added in. It's utterly miserable trying to use an evolving library otherwise :) regards john -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
