On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:33:08AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:58:24AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > Hum, we say it's an uri, but we interpret is differently if it's not > > absolute > > this could lead to confusion. But I'm not sure being a purist here would > > help > > that much from an user POV. > > I agree - the fact that the 'uri' to virConnectOpen doesn't technically have > to > always be a URI (eg, NULL, or Xen, or xen) is a major cause of pain > virt-manager > since we have to special case parsing of it, rather than just handing off to a > generic URI parser module. We should mandate wellformed URIs for the migrate > API, where wellformed is defined to be whatever libxml is able to parse :-)
libxml2 is pedanticly following RFC 2396, though at some point I will need to update to its successor RFC 3986 Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
