Daniel Veillard wrote:

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:29:07PM -0400, beth kon wrote:
[PATCH 1/2] - add capability to access free memory information on each NUMA cell.

Signed-off-by: Beth Kon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

--
Elizabeth Kon (Beth)
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


diff -urpN libvirt.danielpatch/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in 
libvirt.cellsMemory/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
--- libvirt.danielpatch/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in    2007-09-11 
15:29:43.000000000 -0400
+++ libvirt.cellsMemory/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in    2007-09-20 
14:11:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -586,8 +586,9 @@ int virDomainDetachDevice(virDomainPtr d
 */

int                      virNodeGetCellsFreeMemory(virConnectPtr conn,
-                                                  unsigned long *freeMems,
-                                                  int nbCells);
+                                                  long long *freeMems,
+                                                  int startCell,
+                                                  int maxCells);

Hum, I just realize something, shouldn't we use unsigned long long *freeMems
instead. I don't see what semantic a negative value can carry, but
maybe I missed something !

Daniel

Yes, I agree. I'll change that.

--
Elizabeth Kon (Beth)
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to