DL> Would init or boot make sense in this case as well? I'm open to DL> changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone.
I think that "init" is a widely-recognized term for the master process in a given process namespace. I would also think that, at least from a libvirt perspective, most people would be interested in having an init-like process structure within their containers. Thus, I would vote for using <init> over <boot> or <application>. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpydcMD77cAA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
