Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:42 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> If I do as you suggest and move the safewrite definition into util.h,
>> and make it static inline, then both problems go away.
>
> Make sure to try and build this with gcc-4.3.0 - remember that we
> un-inlined xstrtol() because of:
>
> internal.h:272: error: inlining failed in call to 'xstrtol_i': call is
> unlikely and code size would grow
>
> Again, the option is to stop using -Winline, but it's probably about
> time we figured out some proper way of sharing code between libvirt.so
> and virsh etc. without adding it to the ABI.
>
> How about a libvirtutil libtool convenience (i.e. static) library?
This does sound like a better idea.
I'll prepare a patch to does that,
and probably move at least these into it, too:
__virStrToLong_i;
__virStrToLong_ull;
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
