On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 15:40 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Yes, you'd be trying to merge overlapping namespaces, but some ideas
> > on
> > that front:
> >
> > - If you simply prevent someone defining a VM using the same name as
> > an existing VM defined via another driver, that gets you 90% there
>
> Which we're unable to prevent.
I was talking about the trivial case - prevent a user from creating a
conflict using the default connection. That gets us the right thing in
at least 90% of use cases IMHO.
> We are fundamentally dealing with different
> namespaces with both 'name' and 'id' values - any attempt to merge them
> is doomed to failure.
Yes, they are fundamentally different namespaces. But the fact that
they are fundamentally different namespaces is nothing but a hinderance
to users, and fudging an aggregation of these fundamentally different
namespaces should be both possible and beneficial to most users.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
