"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:38:56PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu_driver.c
>> index f97ef18..d9a7aca 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu_driver.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu_driver.c
>> @@ -1315,8 +1315,9 @@ static void qemudDispatchVMEvent(int fd, int events, 
>> void *opaque) {
>>          qemudDispatchVMFailure(driver, vm, fd);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int qemudMonitorCommand(struct qemud_driver *driver ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> -                               struct qemud_vm *vm,
>> +static int qemudMonitorCommand(const struct qemud_driver *driver
>> +                               ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> +                               const struct qemud_vm *vm,
>
>
> I don't like having annotations for a param on a separate line, because
> it doesn't read naturally. If we really need to wrap this, then lets
> follow the style of putting the return type on a line before , eg
>
>  static int
>  qemudMonitorCommand(const struct qemud_driver *driver ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>                      const struct qemud_vm *vm,

Good idea.
I prefer that anyhow, because it's what I'm used to and since
some naive start-of-function-finding tools work better that way.

> If it is still over 80 characters with this convention, then so be it.

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to