On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:43:06PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > And Ubuntu have already shipped a product with a patch using this > syntax applied, so we can't reasonably change it.
Ironically, I'm with Daniel Veillard on this one. Sure, it'd be nice if it was factored into the decision to some extent, but I'd be sad if I have somehow short-circuited the development process by forcing this decision onto the rest of you guys. I clearly read too much into the fact that Richard had posted a patch that used this syntax and noone objected. My bad entirely, and I'll deal with the mess it causes. Somehow. :) -- Soren Hansen | Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
