"Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> Here's a patch which should address all concerns raised, although I >> left the VIR_MEMORY_VIRTUAL flag because I still think it's important >> to have it. >> >> Please note to whomever is maintaining libvirt in Fedora that there is >> a change to the specfile. > > Any comments on this patch?
Looks fine! -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
